ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent calibration method for microscopic parameters in the discrete element method based on ensemble learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Block Discrete Element Method is widely used in engineering research because it can accurately model fractured rock masses. However, the accuracy of simulations depends on selecting appropriate microscopic parameters, which cannot be directly obtained from macroscopic rock tests. Therefore, calibrating microscopic parameters is essential to ensure that the model's macroscopic physical and mechanical states align with laboratory test results. Traditional trial-and-error calibration methods are highly inefficient and computationally demanding. To address this challenge, this study randomly generated microscopic parameters for discrete block elements and established computational models for uniaxial compression, Brazilian splitting, and triaxial compression tests. Maximum-edge length of the Voronoi Trigons and failure modes were analyzed to verify model reliability. Based on the results, a macroscopic-microscopic parameter dataset was constructed, and correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between microscopic parameters and macroscopic behavior. Subsequently, a Stacking ensemble learning model was developed, trained, and tested. The optimal Stacking ensemble model outperformed others across multiple tasks, achieving higher R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.