ArticleScientific reports2025
Statistical prediction method of inclined shaft blasting fragmentation based on dynamic damage distribution in excavated rock mass.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address pilot shaft blockage and fragmentation control issues in inclined shaft blasting excavation, this study investigated the coupling mechanism between excavated rock mass damage distribution and fragmentation gradation using the Tianchi Pumped Storage Power Station water diversion tunnel inclined shaft project. A statistical correlation between dynamic damage distribution and blasting fragmentation was established through field blasting experiments and LS-DYNA numerical simulations. Based on this correlation, a fragmentation prediction model was developed using the dynamic damage distribution of the excavated rock mass.The study analyzed the influence mechanisms of three key parameters - decoupling coefficient, blasthole spacing, and detonating delay time - on rock fragmentation and size distribution, determining optimized blasting parameters for the project. Results show the damage distribution-based prediction model achieved high fitting accuracy (R²=0.9689) with maximum field validation deviation of only 2.49%, demonstrating excellent engineering applicability and promotional value. The decoupling coefficient and blasthole spacing are primary controlling factors for fragmentation distribution. Reducing the decoupling coefficient and decreasing blasthole spacing significantly enhance rock fragmentation degree and fine particle content while suppressing oversized fragment generation. Detonating delay time has limited impact, serving primarily an auxiliary optimization function. Optimized blasting parameters effectively reduced oversized fragment percentage and improved blasting efficiency and economic viability. The proposed blasting fragmentation statistical prediction method provides a novel and implementable technical approach for fragmentation prediction and parameter optimization in complex underground engineering projects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.