Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057674›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Socioeconomic position and access to supportive cancer care in Europe: a scoping review of literature from 2000 to 2024.

Esther C E de Jongh, Gunn Ammitzbøll, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Eva Boomstra, Stevie van der Mierden, Susanne O Dalton, Martijn M Stuiver

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esther C E de JonghDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gunn AmmitzbøllDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Cancer Survivorship, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lonneke V van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva BoomstraDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stevie van der MierdenScientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susanne O DaltonDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Cancer Survivorship, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martijn M StuiverDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.stuiver@nki.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer prevalence is steadily rising in Europe. Many survivors experience symptoms and late effects that require management by supportive care. The inequities related to socioeconomic position (SEP) that have been described for primary anti-cancer treatment are likely to extend to the supportive care domain. This scoping review provides an overview of the existing literature assessing this relationship, and the methods used to do so.

methodsA comprehensive search was executed in May 2024 in multiple databases. Studies published after 2000, including real-world data on access to, uptake of, or adherence to supportive care in relation to SEP were included.

resultsA total of 29 articles were included for review. Studies reported on a variety of supportive care types and were conducted primarily in Northern and Western Europe. Most studies with statistically significant findings (n = 14) reported an association between high SEP and increased access to or uptake of supportive care (n = 12).

conclusionsResearch on the association of SEP with access and uptake of supportive care is increasing but still limited. Methodology varies and is mostly exploratory. The majority of the included studies indicate that socioeconomic differences in engagement with supportive cancer care in Europe persist. More research is needed to explain the causal pathways through which SEP affects engagement with supportive care, and how its accessibility can be improved in different European countries. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Efforts should be made across healthcare systems to improve accessibility to supportive cancer care for patients with a low SEP.

Indexed as

Cancer rehabilitationEuropeHealth disparitiesPsychosocial servicesSocioeconomic positionSupportive care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.