ArticlePain and therapy2025
Reducing Pain and Improving Mobility Using Haptic Patch Technology: Results of the RESTORE Study.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RESTORE (Relieving Pain and Improving Sleep: Evaluating Topical Pain Relief and Sleep Patches to Optimize Effectiveness)
The OPTIMA Study ("Observing Performance of Haptic Vibrotactile Trigger Technology by Measuring Changes in Resting Metabolic Rate: Assessment and Analysis")
Prevention and Reduction of Falls: Testing and Evaluating Cutting Edge Haptic Technology (PROTECT)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute and chronic pain affects patients' overall health status and well-being, and the assessment and treatment of these patients can be challenging. Unfortunately, many patients fail to respond to the available multimodal treatment options, with some even failing advanced interventions including surgery. Therefore, alternative approaches to pain treatment represent an unmet medical need. Haptic vibrotactile trigger technology (VTT) is designed to target nociceptive pathways and is theorized to disrupt the neuromatrix of pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of a wearable VTT haptic patch in adults diagnosed with mild-to-moderate acute or chronic pain.
methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. A total of 118 research participants (58 male, 60 female) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to either a treatment group receiving the active patch (N = 64) or a control group which used a similar-appearing vehicle/placebo patch (N = 54). Assessments were performed at baseline (day 0), day 7, and day 14. Reduction in pain severity and interference was assessed using the validated Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and range of motion/flexibility assessment was performed using the Schober (only for low back pain), goniometer, and bubble inclinometer tests. Data for the active patch user group and the control group were aggregated and compared over the 14-day time frame of the study.
resultsThe active patch user group had significantly greater improvement in pain severity and reduction in pain interference; in addition, the active patch group showed greater objective improvement in range of motion (ROM)/flexibility than the control group at day 7 and day 14.
conclusionThese findings suggest that this non-pharmacological, noninvasive, topical VTT haptic patch (FREEDOM Super Patch with VTT) can reduce pain severity and increase ROM/flexibility. Considering the multitude of serious adverse effects associated with standard pharmacological pain treatments, clinicians should consider this readily available, over-the-counter VTT patch as a potential first-line or adjunct therapy to treat pain.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06505005.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.