Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057662›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Diagnosis and grading of adrenal cortical carcinoma.

Giulia Vocino Trucco, Eleonora Duregon, Mauro Papotti, Marco Volante

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hormonal functional status and prognostic stratification in adrenocortical carcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia Vocino TruccoPathology Unit, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-6994
Eleonora DuregonDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-3983
Mauro PapottiDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-1700
Marco VolanteDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, Orbassano, Turin, 10043, Italy. marco.volante@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0719-105X

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 27891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5th edition of the WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors represents a significant advancement in the diagnostic approach to adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), integrating novel molecular insights with established histopathological criteria to enhance diagnostic accuracy and to refine prognostic assessment. This review outlines key histopathological features and diagnostic strategies for ACC, offering a practical framework for evaluation and grading in daily practice. The updated WHO classification reaffirms the central role of histopathology, employing multiparametric scoring systems that assess invasion, architectural and cytological features, mitotic activity, and necrosis. However, these parameters often pose interpretive challenges, and no single algorithm ensures complete sensitivity, specificity, or reproducibility. Therefore, combining diagnostic approaches is advisable, particularly in morphologically ambiguous cases. For tumor grading, the WHO employs a two-tiered system based on a mitotic count cut of 20 per 10 mm

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex NeoplasmsAdrenocortical CarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorAdrenal cortical carcinomaClassificationDiagnosisGradingScoring

Identifiers

PMID41057662
PMCPMC12876101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.