Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057654›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2025

Impact of the indigenous rotavirus vaccine Rotavac in the Universal Immunization Program in India during 2016-2020.

Nayana P Nair, Samarasimha N Reddy, Sidhartha Giri, Tintu Varghese, Varunkumar Thiyagarajan, Jayaprakash Muliyil, Priya Hemavathy, Shainey Alokit Khakha, Rashmi Arora, Mohan D Gupte and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nayana P Nair *The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6646-7338
Samarasimha N Reddy *Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-1200
Sidhartha GiriThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Tintu VargheseThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Varunkumar ThiyagarajanThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Jayaprakash MuliyilThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Priya HemavathyThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Shainey Alokit KhakhaThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Rashmi AroraTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.
Mohan D GupteIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Jaqueline E TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Umesh D ParasharCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Venkata Raghava MohanDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. venkat@cmcvellore.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-7223
Gagandeep KangThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-564X
Collaborators of the rotavirus vaccine effectiveness and impact assessment network

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) OPP1165083U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MOA#871-15SC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, India introduced Rotavac (G9P[11]), an indigenous oral rotavirus vaccine administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age through the Universal Immunization Program. Evaluating its effectiveness under routine programmatic conditions is critical, given the variable performance of rotavirus vaccines in low- and middle-income countries. Here we assessed Rotavac's real-world effectiveness and impact across 31 hospitals in 9 states between 2016 and 2020 using a test-negative case-control design. Overall, 24,624 children were enrolled in surveillance (62% male and 38% female). Of 8,372 children aged 6-59 months eligible for effectiveness analysis (1,790 rotavirus-positive cases and 5,437 rotavirus-negative controls), 6,646 received 3 doses and 581 were unvaccinated. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness of 3 doses against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45% to 62%), with 1,574 vaccinated cases versus 5,072 vaccinated controls. Among children aged 6-23 months (1,486 vaccinated cases and 4,595 vaccinated controls), genotype-specific adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 51% (95% CI 36% to 62%) for G3P[8], 81% (95% CI 73% to 87%) for G1P[8] and 64% (95% CI 21% to 83%) for G1P[6]. Following vaccine introduction, rotavirus positivity among hospitalized children declined from 40% to 20%. These findings confirm that Rotavac provides substantial protection against severe rotavirus disease, including nonvaccine strains, and performs comparably to internationally licensed vaccines in similar settings.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolFemaleGastroenteritisHumansIndiaInfantMaleVaccinationVaccine EfficacyVaccines, AttenuatedRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID41057654
PMCPMC12618247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.