Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057645›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Estimation of woody vegetation biomass in Australia based on multi-source remote sensing data and stacking models.

Chenxi Liu, Shuo Shi, Zhanmang Liao, Tong Wang, Wei Gong, Zixi Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenxi Liu *Electronic Information School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Shuo ShiElectronic Information School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. shishuo@whu.edu.cn.
Zhanmang LiaoSchool of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Tong Wang *State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Wei GongElectronic Information School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. weigong@whu.edu.cn.
Zixi ShiState Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42471413Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2024AFA069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegetation serves as the most critical carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems and plays a vital role in mitigating global climate change. Australia features a vast and diverse landscape, ranging from dense eucalyptus forests to sparse woodlands, and harbors rich biodiversity. However, the significant spatial heterogeneity across the continent presents substantial challenges for accurately estimating regional aboveground biomass (AGB). This study aims to assess the accuracy of various models in AGB estimation. The dataset includes field-measured biomass and multi-source remote sensing data, such as vegetation canopy height products, Landsat imagery, topographic data, and climate variables. To build biomass estimation models, a Stacking regressor is constructed, and extensive comparative experiments were conducted. The Stacking model comprises seven base learners and one meta-learner. The meta-learner learns to optimally combine the predictions of the base models by minimizing prediction error. The experiments include: (1) comparing the performance of the Stacking model with seven individual machine learning models using K-fold cross-validation, and (2) evaluating the impact of recursive feature elimination (RFE) on model performance before and after feature selection. Based on predictive performance, the Stacking, Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), and Random Forest (RF) models are selected for biomass mapping. In addition, we introduced the Monte Carlo simulation approach to evaluate the uncertainty of biomass estimation. Results show that the Stacking model outperforms all individual machine learning models across all forest types. The final [Formula: see text] values for the Stacking, GBR, and RF models are 0.74, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, with RMSE values of 49.79 Mg/ha, 51.00 Mg/ha, and 52.18 Mg/ha. The integration of multi-source data effectively addresses the limitations of single-source datasets, and the ensemble learning approach enhances the robustness of biomass estimation. This study provides theoretical and technical support for large-scale AGB estimation in heterogeneous vegetation landscapes.

Indexed as

BiomassRemote Sensing TechnologyAustraliaClimate ChangeEcosystemEucalyptusForestsMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalBiomassMachine learningMulti-source remote sensingWoody vegetation

Identifiers

PMID41057645
PMCPMC12504679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.