Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057631›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.

Taylor B Harrison, Jessica A Sinclair, Lisa J Martin, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Holly Elder, Sunyang Fu, Hongfang Liu, William B Brinkman, Melanie F Myers, Michelle L McGowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Decisional Conflict Among Adolescents and Young Adults Before and After Facilitated Decision-Making About Learning Personal Genomic Information.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taylor B HarrisonBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jessica A SinclairBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lisa J MartinDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kristin Childers-BuschleDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Holly ElderDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Sunyang FuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hongfang LiuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
William B BrinkmanUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Melanie F MyersDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michelle L McGowanBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. mcgowan.michelle2@mayo.edu.

Funding

Engaging adolescents in decisions about return of genomic research resultsR01HG010166 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGOWAN, MICHELLE L, MYERS, MELANIE F · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
National Institutes of Health National Human Genome Research Institute R01HG010166NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.

Identifiers

PMID41057631
PMCPMC12504426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.