Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057614›Full record

Trial reportNature metabolism2025

Effect of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on weight management and gut microbiota composition in individuals with overweight or obesity: the SWEET study.

Michelle D Pang, Louise Kjølbæk, Jacco J A J Bastings, Sabina Stoffer Hjorth Andersen, Alexander Umanets, Mônica Maurer Sost, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Kyriakos Reppas, Graham Finlayson, Charo E Hodgkins and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04226911 (Sweeteners and Sweetness Enhancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04226911 nacompletednot on this map

Sweeteners and Sweetness Enhancers: Prolonged Effects on Health, Obesity and Safety

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnne Birgitte RabenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled379ConditionsObesityArmsS&SEs, Sugar
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of sweeteners in weight loss.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Michelle D Pang *Department of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-727X
Louise Kjølbæk *Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4310-9332
Jacco J A J Bastings *Department of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sabina Stoffer Hjorth Andersen *Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Alexander UmanetsCentre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation (HEFI), Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Mônica Maurer SostCentre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation (HEFI), Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Santiago Navas-CarreteroCenter for Nutrition Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-2230
Kyriakos ReppasDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Graham FinlaysonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-2256
Charo E HodgkinsFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4775-0338
Marta Del ÁlamoEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Paris, France.
Tony LamNetUnion sarl, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hariklia MoshoyiannisInternational Reference Laboratory Services, Bioiatriki, Athens, Greece.
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-2488
Tanja C M AdamDepartment of Nutrition & Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gijs H GoossensDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-3019
Jason C G HalfordSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Joanne A HarroldDepartment of Psychology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Alfredo MartinezCentro de investigación Biomédica en Red, Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Ellen E Blaak *Department of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.blaak@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-3464
Anne Raben *Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. ara@nexs.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-4491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SEs) is a popular strategy to reduce sugar intake, but the role of S&SEs in body weight regulation and gut microbiota composition remains debated. Here, we show that S&SEs in a healthy diet support weight loss maintenance and beneficial gut microbiota shifts in adults with overweight or obesity. In this multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial, we included 341 adults and 38 children with overweight or obesity. Adults followed a 2-month low-energy diet for ≥5% weight loss, followed by a 10-month healthy ad libitum diet with <10% energy from sugars. One group replaced sugar-rich products with S&SE products (S&SEs group), while the other did not (sugar group). Primary outcomes included changes in body weight and gut microbiota composition at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in cardiometabolic parameters. The S&SEs group, compared to the sugar group, maintained greater weight loss at 1 year (1.6 ± 0.7 kg, P = 0.029) and exhibited distinct gut microbiota shifts, with increased short-chain fatty acid and methane-producing taxa (q ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were observed in cardiometabolic markers or in children. Overall, our findings indicate that prolonged consumption of S&SEs in a healthy diet is a safe strategy for obesity management. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT04226911 .

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeObesityOverweightSweetening AgentsAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWeight LossSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID41057614
PMCPMC12552123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.