Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057601›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2025

Decoding replication stress responses through post-translational modifications.

Jinhua Han, Mengjie Wu, Ting Liu, Jun Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinhua HanZhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Mengjie WuStomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical, Hangzhou, China.
Ting LiuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. liuting518@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-3396
Jun HuangZhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. jhuang@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-653X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U24A20717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication is a fundamental cellular process that ensures the faithful duplication of the genome during cell division. However, this process is frequently challenged by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors that can impede replication fork progression and jeopardize genomic integrity. To safeguard against these challenges, cells have evolved intricate stress response mechanisms, including replication checkpoint activation, translesion DNA synthesis, repriming and fork reversal, all of which are vital for preserving genomic stability. Central to the orchestration of these pathways are post-translational modifications (PTMs), which dynamically regulate the stability, localization, and activity of key proteins involved in the replication stress responses. In this Review, we summarize the primary mechanisms that orchestrate cellular responses to replication stress and highlight emerging insights into the roles of both histone and nonhistone PTMs in the precise and coordinated regulation of replication fork dynamics under genotoxic conditions.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsDNA DamageGenomic InstabilityHistonesHumansHistones

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.