ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of medication timing and patient involvement in adherence to treatment for hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite improvements in the effectiveness of medication for the treatment of hypertension, patient adherence to prescription regimens remains a challenge in clinical practice. This study examined the impact of two factors on improving medication adherence: medication timing (morning timing is considered as 06:00–10:00, and evening timing, as 20:00-midnight) and patient involvement. Following the STROBE guidelines, a cross-sectional survey design was undertaken at a university hospital between May and August 2023. Three hundred and four inpatients with a diagnosis of hypertension comprised the study sample. Data was gathered using the Control Preferences and Medication Adherence Report Scales. The results revealed that patients preferred to take a passive role in taking their medications (60.2%). However, more active patient participation in decision-making resulted from considering patients’ daily routines (80.9%) and positive attitudes from healthcare providers during communication (69.4%). Regression analyses indicated that patient involvement (OR:5.649, 95%CI [2.528–12.622]), rather than medication timing (OR:1.052, 95%CI [0.591-1.875]), predicted treatment adherence. Shared decision-making improved adherence to medication regimes compared with passive acceptance (81.0% vs. 50.8%; p = .000). These findings underscore the significance of patient involvement. Given patients’ preference for a paternalistic approach, in which healthcare providers make the decisions, often without patients’ active involvement, promoting participation through strategies such as providing ample time for treatment discussions, offering information, and aligning treatment hours with patients’ daily routines are promising approaches for enhancing adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.