ArticleScientific reports2025
Age estimation of children and adolescents from mandibles using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age estimation through mandibular radiomic attributes in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age estimation is a crucial step in forensic identification, particularly in scenarios where dental structures may be absent. This study aimed to develop and evaluate supervised machine learning models to predict chronological age based on mandibular morphometric measurements in children and adolescents. A sample of lateral cephalometric radiographs from 401 orthodontic patients aged between 6 and 16 years was analysed. Linear and angular mandibular measurements including the total mandibular length (Co-Pog), mandibular ramus height (Co-Go), mandibular body length (Go-Gn), and the gonial angle (Ar-Go-Me) were analysed. Eight supervised machine learning algorithms were trained to predict chronological age based on these measurements and sex. The dataset was split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets, with stratified 5-fold cross-validation to prevent overfitting. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²), with 95% confidence intervals estimated via bootstrapping. The models based on mandibular morphometric features and sex achieved a minimum MAE of 1.54 years (95% CI: 1.33-1.76) and RMSE of 1.93 (95% CI: 1.66-2.18) on the test set. Cross-validation confirmed model stability, with the Gradient Boosting Regressor achieving the best performance, showing a MAE of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.09-1.32) and R² of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.64). Total mandibular length (Co-Pog) and mandibular ramus height (Co-Go) were the most important predictors. Pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differences favoring ensemble methods over linear and simpler tree models. Supervised machine learning models demonstrated promising accuracy for age estimation based on mandibular measurements in growing individuals. Gradient Boosting emerged as the most effective algorithm. However, the generalizability of the models may be influenced by population-specific characteristics and the need for prior knowledge of certain predictor variables. Further external validations are recommended to enhance model applicability across diverse forensic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.