SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Short-term and long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D status and response to supplementation in very preterm infants: A prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Comparative effectiveness of low-dose versus high-dose vitamin D on bone metabolic markers in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of different vitamin D supplementation doses on vitamin D status and bone metabolism in preterm infants.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Hospital-acquired infections in preterm infants with gestational age <32 weeks: a retrospective study of clinical characteristics, pathogen distribution, and associated factors.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meta-analysis conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose (≥800 IU/day) and low-dose (<800 IU/day) vitamin D supplementation on preterm infants. Study quality was evaluated using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 for randomized trials. 21 studies included 1130 infants. Regarding short-term (before 40 weeks' postmenstrual age [PMA] or at discharge) outcomes, high-dose vitamin D supplementation was associated with increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels (mean difference 15.62 [13.35-17.88]) and growth velocities, as well as decreased vitamin D deficiency (VDD), skeletal hypomineralization, and mortality. In the subgroup analysis of high-dose supplementation stratified by dosage, 800 IU/day significantly increased serum 25(OH)D levels (mean difference 13.99 [9.03-18.95]) and reduced the risk of VDD (risk difference -0.21 [-0.32 to -0.10]) compared to 400 IU/day, without increasing the risk of vitamin D excess. The long-term outcomes assessed after 40 weeks' PMA or at follow-up visits showed no significant differences in vitamin D status or neurodevelopmental outcomes between the high-dose and low-dose groups. The certainty of the evidence ranges from moderate to very low. High-dose vitamin D supplementation improved short-term outcomes by increasing serum 25(OH)D levels, promoting growth, and reducing mortality. Among the high-dose regimens, 800 IU/day appeared to be the most appropriate dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.