ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating individual and mixed arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for controlling Rhizoctonia root rot in lupine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioformulations of Entrophospora lutea enriched with biostimulants for growth promotion and control of Rhizoctonia root rot in lupine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Deep Placement Fertilization on Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bio-stimulants for plant growth promotion and sustainable management of Rhizoctonia Solani causing black scurf of potato tubers.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupin is an economically and ecologically important legume crop. However, it is susceptible to infection with Rhizoctonia solani, which causes damping off and root rot diseases. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) as a biological control agent has emerged as a promising alternative to chemical fungicides. Four species of AMF, namely Entrophospora etunicata, Rhizophagus clarus, Rhizophagus intraradices, Entrophospora lutea and their mixture were evaluated to determine their compatibility with lupine plants, also as a biocontrol agent against damping-off and root-rot diseases in comparison with the chemical fungicide Rizolex-T. All mycorrhizal treatments significantly reduced damping-off disease and increased the surviving plants under greenhouse and field conditions. The most effective isolates were Entrophospora lutea, followed by R. intraradices. Alongside their biocontrol activity, they positively enhance the uptake of macro- and micronutrients, promoting nodulation, and boosting nitrogenase enzyme activity. Additionally, they improved various plant growth parameters, increased yield, and stimulated the activity of peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and elevated phenolic compounds. Moreover, greater accumulations of proline, chlorophyll, and carotenoids were observed. However, Entrophospora lutea treatment was effective as Rizolex-T in disease reduction and superior in enhancing plant growth and yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.