ArticleScientific reports2025
Analytical and machine learning approaches identify a sea star steroid with promising activity for COVID-19 therapeutic development.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of SARS-CoV-2 bioactivity: integrating ICBMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pressing demand for safe and efficient COVID-19 treatments has intensified interest in Natural products, especially those derived from marine organisms. In this study, a bioactive steroidal compound, 5α-cholesta-9(11)-en-3β,20β-diol, was successfully isolated from the starfish Acanthaster planci. Structural elucidation was achieved using HREIMS, FTIR, and advanced 1D/2D NMR spectroscopy, confirming a molecular formula of C₂₇H₄₆O₂ and characteristic functionalities including hydroxyl and double bond moieties. The compound demonstrated notable anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, attaining 85% viral inhibition at 5 ng/µl with an IC₅₀ of 5.86 µM, as demonstrated by plaque reduction assays. Molecular docking studies demonstrated significant binding affinities toward key viral targets Mpro, NSP10, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase with free binding energies of -26.85, -27.59, and - 35.08 kcal/mol, respectively. These affinities surpassed those of their respective co-crystallized reference ligands. In-silico ADMET profiling indicated favorable pharmacokinetic properties, including high BBB penetration, moderate intestinal absorption, and non-hepatotoxicity. Toxicity assessments predicted low carcinogenic risk, a high rat MTD, and minimal ocular and dermal irritancy. Additionally, we developed a predictive web application based on machine learning to estimate IC₅₀ values of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors, streamlining the drug discovery process. The forecasted values nearly matched the experimental outcomes, demonstrating the model's reliability and its potential to reduce time, cost, and risk in early-stage drug development. Moreover, machine learning models, particularly XGBoost, demonstrated excellent performance in predicting pIC₅₀ values (RMSE = 0.1357, MAE = 0.1022), supporting the development of a web-based IC₅₀ prediction application. The bioactivity prediction platform ENHPCG further validated the compound's antiviral potential, estimating an IC₅₀ of 5.95 µM. Overall, these integrated analytical, biological, and computational approaches highlight 5α-cholesta-9(11)-en-3β,20β-diol as a potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor and a candidate for further pharmacological development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.