ArticleScientific reports2025
DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT a time-frequency analysis method for noisy blasting seismic waves with adaptive noise suppression and endpoint processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trend term and noise removal method for blasting vibration signals based on Fourier decomposition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-Fidelity Weak Signal Extraction for Coiled Tubing Acoustic Telemetry via Micro-Lever Suspension and Joint Denoising.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) is widely used for time-frequency analysis of blasting seismic wave signals due to its unique adaptability. However, blasting seismic wave signals are typical non-stationary vibration signals that are susceptible to noise interference, leading to mode confusion and endpoint effects in empirical mode decomposition (EMD) in HHT, which in turn affects the accuracy of time-frequency analysis. In order to obtain accurate time-frequency characteristic parameters of blasting seismic wave signals, it is necessary to improve HHT. A time-frequency analysis algorithm called DEP- CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT was proposed. The first step of the algorithm is to perform dual endpoint processing (DEP) on the signal. The second step is to combine the advantages of complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) and multi-scale permutation entropy (MPE) to obtain CEEMDAN-MPE, and perform CEEMDAN-MPE on the DEP processed signal to achieve synchronous suppression of high-frequency noise and low-frequency trend terms. The third step is to perform a normalized Hilbert transform (NHT) on the intrinsic mode function (IMF) obtained from DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE to achieve INHT. The above three steps can establish the time-frequency analysis algorithm of DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT. Through noisy simulation signal testing, the comparative study of DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT and HHT is carried out. Finally, the algorithm is applied to the time-frequency analysis of actual blasting seismic wave signals. The results show that DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT not only suppresses the EMD endpoint effect and mode confusion, but also obtains the time spectrum with high resolution in time domain and frequency domain. Through DEP-CEEMDAN-MPE-INHT time-frequency analysis, the time-frequency characteristic parameters of blasting seismic wave signal can be accurately extracted, which has important practical significance for the hazard identification and control of blasting seismic wave.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.