Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Modified RECIST submodels and ordinal regression model predict neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer​​.

Shu Chen, Shenghong Wei, Zaisheng Ye, Cheng Wei, Sheng Liu, Yi Wang, Yi Zeng, Jinhu Chen, Xiaopeng Wang, Jianping Jiang and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shu ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Shenghong WeiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Zaisheng YeDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Cheng WeiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Sheng LiuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Yi ZengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Jinhu ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Xiaopeng WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Jianping JiangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Xiaoling ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Luchuan ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital,NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, No 420 Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China. sheeook@163.com.

Funding

High-level Talent Training Program of Fujian Cancer Hospital 2024YNG08IIT Funds of Fujian Cancer Hospital 202413002Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022J011060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated predictive models integrating Computed Tomography(CT) and ultrasound(US) to assess neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). A prospective multicenter trial (n = 75) developed five RECIST 1.1-derived submodels (RECIST_Expansion, UC_RECIST, CT_RECIST, V-RECIST, U-RECIST) and an ordinal regression-based nomogram, using pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) as the reference standard. The geometric approximation model V-RECIST exhibited superior diagnostic performance for TRG 0-2 vs. 3 discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.951, sensitivity 96.8%/specificity 80.1%) and TRG 0-1 vs. 2-3 classification (AUC = 0.868, sensitivity 85.7%/specificity 80.0%), validated by calibration curves and decision curve analysis. The US-only U-RECIST demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.906/0.811), suitable for preliminary assessment due to its safety and cost-effectiveness. The remaining models-RECIST_Expansion (lymph node evaluation only), UC_RECIST (CT-US combined protocol with gastric lesions as measurable targets), and CT_RECIST (CT-only for no-US settings)-also showed satisfactory accuracy. The ordinal regression model achieved slightly higher AUC values (0.952/0.870) and cross-validation accuracy (0.73) compared to modified RECIST models. These findings highlight the clinical utility of revised RECIST 1.1 models across diverse scenarios, with V-RECIST demonstrating the highest performance, U-RECIST offering radiation-free assessment and cost-effectiveness, and the ordinal model enhancing visualization while preserving diagnostic superiority.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyChemoimmunotherapyColor doppler ultrasound; nomogram modelLocal advanced gastric cancer (LAGC)Neo-adjuvant therapyRECIST

Identifiers

PMID41057487
PMCPMC12504738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.