Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057475›Full record

ArticleCommunications engineering2025

Optimising housing typology distributions for multi-hazard loss reductions in resource-constrained settings.

Arvin Hadlos, Aaron Opdyke, S Ali Hadigheh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editors' Choice 2025.Communications engineering · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arvin HadlosSchool of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. arvin.hadlos@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-7479
Aaron OpdykeSchool of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-6270
S Ali HadighehSchool of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disaster loss estimations are valuable risk reduction tools but rarely consider the loss trade-offs when a building stock is subjected to multi-hazard impacts. Here, we developed an approach to simulate direct economic losses of a housing stock and explore loss reduction across scenarios of housing typology distributions. We used multi-objective optimisation to model wind and seismic losses in Itbayat, Batanes, Philippines. Using Monte Carlo simulation, 11,628 housing stock scenarios were modelled under two cases of paired extreme hazard intensity thresholds, identifying Pareto optimal solutions that were further analysed against a socio-technical framework. We show that the current housing stock distribution can sustain lower multi-hazard losses by achieving more optimal combinations of lightweight and reinforced concrete typologies. However, transitioning to this desired stock distribution becomes a trade-off of not just wind-seismic loss reductions but also of socio-technical considerations such as households' risk perceptions. Our study advances risk reduction strategies by streamlining loss estimations to inform collective and safer multi-hazard construction practices.

Identifiers

PMID41057475
PMCPMC12504710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.