ArticleScientific reports2025
CT-based study on the safety margin of the anteromedial portal in elbow arthroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing use of elbow arthroscopy, there is a growing concern about the risk of injury to neural structures, particularly the median nerve, when the anteromedial portal is created. This risk, which was previously underestimated, underscores the need for a guide to safe access that can significantly impact surgical practices and patient outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated 83 computer tomographies of the elbow without a higher grade of osteoarthritis and surgical treatment. In a 3D reconstruction, the median nerve was located, and a circle was set around it with a radius of 1.5 cm. This was supposed to represent a safety distance. Now, a tangent line was drawn from the tip of the processus coronoideus along the created circle, and the angle to the trans epicondylar plane was measured. The two legs of the angle crossed the skin. Therefore, the distance between these two intersections was also measured. Using IBM SPSS, we tested the data for normal distribution. The mean angle was 57.38°, and the mean distance between the skin intersections was 4.77 cm. The results suggest that the anteromedial portal, approximately 4.77 cm ventrally, measured from the medial epicondyle and at an angle of 57.38° in the trans epicondylar axis, can be suggested as a safe portal placed with reduced risk of damage to the median nerve based on imagining, with a safety distance of 1.5 cm. This can be helpful during elbow arthroscopy; clinical validation is yet to be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.