ArticleScientific reports2025
Cholinergic modulation enables scalable action selection learning in a computational model of the striatum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The striatum plays a central role in action selection and reinforcement learning, integrating cortical inputs with dopaminergic signals encoding reward prediction errors. While dopamine modulates synaptic plasticity underlying value learning, the mechanisms that enable selective reinforcement of behaviorally relevant stimulus-action associations-the structural credit assignment problem-remain poorly understood, especially in environments with multiple competing stimuli and actions. Here, we present a computational model in which acetylcholine (ACh), released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts plasticity to brief temporal windows following action execution. The model implements a biologically plausible three-factor learning rule requiring presynaptic activity, postsynaptic depolarization, and phasic dopamine, with plasticity gated by cholinergic pauses that temporally align with behaviorally relevant events. This mechanism ensures that only synapses involved in the selected behavior are eligible for modification. Through systematic evaluation across tasks with distractors and contingency reversals, we show that ACh-gated learning promotes synaptic specificity, suppresses cross-channel interference, and yields increasingly competitive performance relative to Q-learning in complex tasks, reflecting the scalability of the proposed learning mechanism. Moreover, the model reveals distinct roles for striatal pathways: direct pathway (D1) neurons maintain stimulus-specific responses, while indirect pathway (D2) neurons are progressively recruited to suppress outdated associations during policy adaptation. These findings provide a mechanistic account of how coordinated cholinergic and dopaminergic signaling can support scalable and efficient reinforcement learning in the striatum, consistent with experimental observations of pathway-specific plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.