ArticleScientific reports2025
Microwave-assisted enhanced activation of date palm leaf char for optimized CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel hybrid approach for producing mesoporous activated carbon (AC) from date palm leaves by integrating conventional carbonization with microwave-assisted activation. K₂CO₃ was utilized for chemical activation to enhance adsorption performance. Three critical parameters, namely microwave power, residence time, and activation temperature, were investigated focusing on yield, temperature ramp-up time, and CO₂ capture capacity. Results reveal that both microwave power and activation temperature were pivotal in influencing the yield and adsorption efficiency. Microwave-assisted activation (850 W, 500 °C, 7 min) yielded an optimal CO₂ adsorption capacity of 126.7 mg/g at 25 °C and 1 bar, with 78% and 76% reductions in activation energy and processing time, respectively. This method enhanced the textural properties of the activated carbon, increasing the surface area to 411 m²/g and improving pore size distribution, as compared to conventional thermal activation (60 min under CO₂), which achieved only 88 mg/g uptake and a surface area of 286 m²/g. Compared to conventional methods, the hybrid approach reduced energy and time demands to about 25%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.