ArticleScientific reports2025
The relationship between curve of Spee modification and changes in temporomandibular joint parameters: a CBCT-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Curve of Spee (COS) is a critical aspect of occlusal anatomy that influences dental alignment and masticatory function. This study aims to evaluate whether COS modifications correlate with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) parameter changes following clear aligner therapy, and compare TMJ adaptations between patients with different initial COS depths. 50 adult patients with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions that underwent clear aligner orthodontic treatment were identified and divided into two groups based on their initial curve of Spee (COS) measurement. Group1: COS < 2 mm, and Group2: COS ≥ 2 mm. Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were used to construct three-dimensional digital models and evaluate TMJ parameters for accurate measurements. Statistically significant changes were found in posterior joint space (PJS) for Group 1 (p = 0.033) and condylar length (CL) for Group 2 (p = 0.006). Independent samples t-test revealed significant differences in CL change scores (p = 0.024) between the two groups. There is a significant association between COS modification and PJS changes (p = 0.043), suggesting that COS modification influences posterior joint space. Clear aligner therapy induces distinct TMJ adaptations depending on initial COS depth: mild COS cases (< 2 mm) exhibit posterior joint space reduction, indicating condylar positional adaptation, while deep COS cases (≥ 2 mm) demonstrate condylar lengthening, suggesting osseous remodeling. However, changes in TMJ parameters remain within physiological limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.