ArticleScientific reports2025
Effectiveness of supervised machine learning models for electrical fault detection in solar PV systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid fuzzy C-means and deep learning framework for intelligent fault classification in solar PV systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though Photovoltaic (PV) systems have emerged as a viable substitute for non-renewable energy sources, their widespread integration into the electrical grid presents several issues today. On the other hand, various faults are a key concern affecting PV plants' production and longevity. The current study uses Machine Learning (ML) algorithms such as Decision Tree (DT), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost to detect and classify PV errors corresponding to Short Circuits (SC), Open Circuits (OC), Ground Faults (GF), and Mismatch Faults (MF). Simulations were conducted in MATLAB/Simulink to analyse voltage, current, and power variations during fault conditions and study their impact. The proposed results show that the effectiveness of ML in electrical fault detection, with the following classification accuracies: SVM - 97.40%, DT- 97.20%, RF - 97.20%, NB - 97.60%, and XGBoost - 98.0%. The effectiveness of the classification is confirmed through confusion matrices and correlation heatmaps. This research highlights the need for integrating intelligent monitoring, real-time IoT-based detection, and prediction analytics to improve PV system reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.