Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid deep learning for smart paddy disease diagnosis using self supervised hierarchical reconstruction and attention based temporal analysis.

Nagamani Thanuboddi, Usha Rani Nelakuditi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nagamani ThanuboddiVignan's Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, Guntur, 522213, India. t.nagamani11@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2528-3694
Usha Rani NelakuditiVignan's Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, Guntur, 522213, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-6002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and early disease detection in paddy crops is essential for maximizing crop yield which ensures food security. Traditional methods are often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and domain-specific expertise. Feed-forward deep-learning models will perform accurate disease detection through the identification of spatial patterns. However, they cannot predict the diseases at the early stages due to the lack of temporal information. Temporal observations will help perform continuous monitoring and detect minute changes in the crops at the early times. To tackle this problem, we proposed Self-Supervised Deep Hierarchical Reconstruction (SSDHR), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) which perform early disease detection based on the spatial and temporal data respectively. The SSDHR network uses multi-branch convolution kernels to extract distinct discriminative characteristics rather than conventional leaf-based indicators. It incorporates spatial, and temporal-based attention mechanism Symmetric Fusion Attention (SFA) to improve feature selection and XGBoost (XGB) classifier for better stability. According to experimental findings, the suggested framework achieves a 99.25% accuracy rate in identifying and classifying 13 paddy classes, including normal, blast, hispa, tungro, white stem borer, brown spot, leaf roller, downy mildew, yellow stem borer, bacterial leaf blight, bacterial leaf streak, black stem borer, and bacterial panicle blight.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOryzaPlant DiseasesCrops, AgriculturalEarly disease detectionLong short-term memory (LSTM)Self-supervised classification deep hierarchical reconstruction network (SSDHR)Symmetric future attention (SFA)XGBooster

Identifiers

PMID41057382
PMCPMC12504721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.