ArticleScientific reports2025
Heavy mental task has no effect on sex differences in muscle fatigability during moderate-intensity isometric contraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In some physical activities with simultaneous mental task, we can observe greater muscle fatigability in women than in men. These differences are evident in various muscle groups, especially during low-intensity isometric or intermittent isometric contractions with the simultaneous heavy mental task. The aim of this study was to monitor the effect of heavy mental task on sex differences in muscle fatigability during isometric contraction of moderate intensity in the biceps brachii muscle. Seventeen men (27.1 ± 2.5 years) and seventeen women (26.2 ± 3.5 years) attended two sessions (control and stressor) where they performed isometric contraction of the biceps brachii muscle to failure at an intensity of 40% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). In control session, the participants performed the isometric contraction to failure alone. In stressor session, a simultaneous heavy mental task was included (subtracting the number 13 from any four-digit number). The time to task failure (TTF) and percentage decrease in the median frequency (MDF) were monitored. We did not observe a sex: session interaction effect for the TTF nor the MDF percentage decrease and therefore we can assume that simultaneous heavy mental task did not affect women more than men. We also did not observe a session effect, so we also can state that the simultaneous heavy mental task did not affect the TTF or the MDF percentage decrease. A sex effect was not observed for the percentage decrease in MDF, but it was statistically significant for TTF, where women lasted 47.9% longer in the control session and 56.4% longer in the stressor session. The simultaneous heavy mental task during isometric contraction to failure of the biceps brachii muscle of moderate intensity does not have a greater effect on women than on men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.