ArticleNature communications2025
HALO: hierarchical causal modeling for single cell multi-omics data.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered AP-1, RUNX, and EGR chromatin dynamics drive human fibrotic lung disease.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- ArchVelo: archetypal velocity modeling for single-cell multi-omic trajectories.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Network methods for diagonal integration of unpaired single-cell multiomics data: a review.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Deciphering skeletal muscle development: cellular heterogeneity and molecular regulatory networks from single-cell and spatial transcriptomic perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Single-cell sequencing and organoids: applications in organ development and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- HALO: hierarchical causal modeling for single cell multi-omics data.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Though open chromatin may promote active transcription, gene expression responses may not be directly coordinated with changes in chromatin accessibility. Most existing methods for single-cell multi-omics data focus only on learning stationary, shared information among these modalities, overlooking modality-specific information delineating cellular states and dynamics resulting from causal relations among modalities. To address this, the epigenome-transcriptome relationship can be characterized in relation to time as coupled (changing dependently) or decoupled (changing independently). We propose the framework HALO, adopting a causal approach to model these temporal causal relations on two levels. On the representation level, HALO factorizes these two modalities into both coupled and decoupled latent representations, revealing their dynamic interplay. On the individual gene level, HALO matches gene-peak pairs and characterizes their changes over time. HALO discovers analogous biological functions between modalities, distinguishes epigenetic factors for lineage specification, and identifies temporal cis-regulation interactions relevant to cellular differentiation and human diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.