Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057347›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

SafeTraffic Copilot: adapting large language models for trustworthy traffic safety assessments and decision interventions.

Yang Zhao, Pu Wang, Yibo Zhao, Hongru Du, Hao Frank Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang Zhao *Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pu Wang *Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yibo ZhaoDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hongru DuDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hao Frank YangDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. haofrankyang@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-8956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting expected traffic crashes and designing targeted interventions are highly challenging due to the inherent complexity of crash data and persistent concerns over the prediction trustworthiness. We introduce SafeTraffic Copilot that adapts Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform expected crash prediction as a text-reasoning task, then attribute critical features for targeted safety interventions. Within the Copilot, SafeTraffic LLM is customized then fine-tuned on the textualized SafeTraffic Event dataset, which consists of 66,205 real-world crash cases with 14.5 million words from five U.S. states. Across multiple prediction tasks including crash type, severity, and number of injuries, SafeTraffic LLM demonstrates a 33.3% to 45.8% improvement in average F1-score over existing works. To interpret these results and inform safety interventions, we introduce SafeTraffic Attribution, a sentence-level feature-attribution framework enabling conditional "what-if" risk analysis. Findings reveal that alcohol-impaired driving is the leading factor for severe crashes, with impairment-related and aggressive behaviors contributing nearly three times more risk than other behaviors. Furthermore, SafeTraffic Attribution identifies critical features during fine-tuning, guiding crash data collection strategies for continual improvement. SafeTraffic Copilot enables prediction and reasoning of conditional crash risks through foundation models, thereby supporting traffic safety improvements and offering clear advantages in generalization, adaptation, and trustworthiness.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficLanguageSafetyAutomobile DrivingHumansLarge Language ModelsRisk AssessmentTrustUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41057347
PMCPMC12504690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.