ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Effects of Partial Occlusion on Response Dynamics and Interregional Processing within Primate Superior Temporal Sulcus.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognizing partially occluded objects is a critical visual function that primates perform with ease, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Previous studies in the macaque inferotemporal cortex have reported mixed results on whether occlusion delays and reduces responses to partially occluded objects. To address this, we recorded single-unit activity from body-responsive regions of the middle and anterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) in male macaques while presenting body stimuli with varying levels of occlusion using a dot pattern. Occlusion reduced response strength and increased onset latency in both regions, and even low occlusion levels altered response dynamics by increasing the difference between the response trough and second peak. While body selectivity was preserved, body decoding accuracy declined and was delayed as occlusion increased. In contrast to some prior reports, we found no consistent enhancement of body decoding during the late response phase. By controlling for information loss and clutter introduced by the occluder, we found that reductions in response strength were partly due to the deletion of body features, whereas changes in response dynamics primarily reflected interactions between the occluder and the remaining body features. Occlusion delayed the first but not the second response peak, suggesting distinct mechanisms for these phases. Peak decoding at high occlusion levels emerged later in anterior than middle STS, indicating a feedforward component. However, representational similarity analysis combined with Granger causality suggested enhanced feedback from anterior to middle STS under high occlusion. Together, these results highlight the response dynamics supporting robust recognition under occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.