SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2026
Risk and protective factors for stroke and transient ischaemic attack in patients with atrial fibrillation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is linked to significant morbidity and mortality, with ischaemic stroke being a leading cause of death. Identifying modifiable risk and protective factors may help reduce stroke incidence in patients with AF.
methodsThis umbrella review evaluated meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the association of protective and risk factors with stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in patients with AF. Observational associations were graded with the Ioannidis framework. Associations from RCTs and non-randomised baseline factors in meta-analyses of RCTs were assessed with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Composite risk scores were summarised separately as risk-stratification tools.
results35 studies were included, comprising 23 meta-analyses of observational studies, reporting on 45 associations and 22 meta-analyses of RCTs on 24 associations based on data from over 7 276 000 participants. Among observational studies, only high levels of N-terminal pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) provided convincing evidence of stroke risk. Previous stroke/TIA and age (65-74 years) were also associated with stroke, supported by a highly suggestive level of evidence. Among meta-analyses of non-randomised factors, female sex, kidney failure, non-paroxysmal AF and type 2 diabetes mellitus were risk factors with moderate to high evidence. However, other well-established risk factors, such as hypertension and vascular disease, were associated with stroke; however, they were supported with a weak level of evidence.
conclusionsDespite stroke being the most severe complication of AF, this umbrella review reveals that few risk factors are supported by high-level evidence. Our findings confirm that elevated NT-proBNP, age and prior stroke are credible stroke risk factors in patients with AF. However, risk factors with weaker evidence, such as hypertension and vascular disease, require further investigation to clarify their actual impact. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023471263.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.