ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Multidisciplinary Delphi study validated variables for calculating cost of medication errors in the Sri Lankan context.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe burden of medication errors needs to be costed but no standard method, nor a standard list of variables, has yet been identified. Hence, this study aimed to establish a standard list of cost variables (SLCV) for calculating the cost of medication errors in Sri Lanka from a provider perspective.
methodsThe study had three discrete phases: a systematic review to identify cost variables used globally to calculate the cost of medication errors (published), followed by a Delphi study with 18 experts to assess appropriateness, accuracy, accessibility and measurability of identified cost variables. Finally, a hospital bill analysis was done to assess accessibility and measurability of cost variables.
resultsIn Delphi round 1, out of 13 cost variables, nine were retained as appropriate for calculating medication error costs. None were rated as accessible or measurable in the healthcare settings in Sri Lanka. Experts highlighted the need for a guideline to use the cost variables, which was then developed and shared among experts in Delphi round 2. The SLCV, including eight variables, was retained as appropriate for calculating medication error cost after Delphi round 2. Thirty-one bills confirmed the accessibility and measurability of most variables in SLCV.
conclusionA standard list comprising eight appropriate cost variables to calculate the cost of medication errors, and a guideline was developed for Sri Lanka. The accessibility of these variables was affirmed through a bill audit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.