Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057196›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for the DISTINCT trial: inDividual, targeted thrombosIS prophylaxis versus the standard 'one-size-fits-all' approach in patients undergoing Total hIp or total kNee replaCemenT - a national, multicentre, randomised, multiarm, open-label trial.

Ruben Y Kok, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Harmen B Ettema, Rolf H H Groenwold, Wilbert B van den Hout, Menno V Huisman, Frederikus A Klok, Rob G H H Nelissen, Nienke van Rein, Merel van Veen and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06581965 (The DISTINCT Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06581965 phase4recruitingnot on this map

The DISTINCT Trial: inDividual, Targeted thrombosIS Prophylaxis Versus the Standard 'One Size Fits All' Approach in Patients Undergoing Total hIp or Total kNee replaCemenT: a National, Multicenter, Randomized, Multi-arm, Open-label Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2024 to 2031Enrolled10,078ConditionsVenous Thromboembolism, Venous Thromboses, Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein ThrombosisArmsShort duration prophylaxis, Higher intensity and longer duration prophylaxis, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruben Y KokDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-6195
Leti van Bodegom-VosDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Harmen B EttemaDepartment of Orthopedics, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Rolf H H GroenwoldDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wilbert B van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Menno V HuismanDepartment of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frederikus A KlokDepartment of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nienke van ReinDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Merel van VeenDutch Hip Patient association 'Vereniging Afwijkende Heupontwikkeling (VAH)', Nijkerk, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9717-4984
Stephan B W VehmeijerDepartment of Orthopedics, Reinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Jan Joost I WiegerinckDepartment of Orthopedics, Bergman Clinics Musculoskeletal Division, Naarden, The Netherlands.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-2303
Banne NemethDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands b.nemeth@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are considered to have a symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk of 1.0%-1.5% despite thromboprophylaxis. Fast-track treatment protocols have substantially lowered the VTE risk in most patients. Hence, the majority of patients may be unnecessarily exposed to the burden and risk of thromboprophylaxis. On the contrary, there are still patients with a high VTE risk who develop VTE despite thromboprophylaxis. Thus, tailored thromboprophylaxis treatment may potentially reduce both VTE and bleeding risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISTINCT (inDividual, targeted thrombosIS prophylaxis versus the standard 'one-size-fits-all' approach in patients undergoing Total hIp or total kNee replaCemenT) trial is a national, multicentre, randomised, multiarm, open-label trial. The main objective is to study whether tailored thromboprophylaxis reduces the occurrence of symptomatic VTE (primary outcome) and major bleeding (primary safety outcome) within 90 days after THA/TKA in comparison with standard thromboprophylaxis. Patients with a low, intermediate or high predicted VTE risk (based on the Thrombosis Risk Prediction following total hip and knee arthroplasty score (TRiP(plasty) score)) will be included in the DISTINCT-1, DISTINCT-2 or DISTINCT-3 studies, respectively. In the DISTINCT-1 trial, 3478 patients will be randomly allocated to receive either in-hospital thromboprophylaxis or standard prophylaxis. In the DISTINCT-2 cohort study, 2500 patients will receive standard prophylaxis. In the DISTINCT-3 trial, 4100 patients will be randomly allocated to receive either 6 weeks of high-dose thromboprophylaxis or standard prophylaxis. Standard prophylaxis consists of a low dose of any approved thromboprophylactic agent for 4 weeks. We hypothesise that (1) the efficacy of in-hospital only thromboprophylaxis is non-inferior in preventing VTE and equally safe compared with standard prophylaxis in patients with a low VTE risk (DISTINCT-1) and (2) prolonged high-dose thromboprophylaxis is superior in preventing VTE as compared with standard prophylaxis in patients with a high VTE risk (DISTINCT-3). Patients with intermediate VTE risk will be observed to evaluate VTE and bleeding rates (DISTINCT-2). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft, EU-trial-number 2023-510186-98. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and during international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06581965.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneePostoperative ComplicationsVenous ThromboembolismFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticoagulantsHipKneeOrthopedicsThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41057196
PMCPMC12506130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.