Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057117›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2025

Sensitivity of quantitative diffusion MRI tractography and microstructure to anisotropic spatial sampling.

Elyssa M McMaster, Nancy R Newlin, Chloe Cho, Gaurav Rudravaram, Adam M Saunders, Aravind R Krishnan, Lucas W Remedios, Michael E Kim, Hanliang Xu, Kurt G Schilling and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Personalized White Matter Bundle Segmentation for Early Childhood.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  7. Modeling a Shared Reality of Tractography through Varied Structural Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elyssa M McMasterDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: elyssa.m.mcmaster@vanderbilt.edu.
Nancy R NewlinDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Chloe ChoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gaurav RudravaramDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Adam M SaundersDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Aravind R KrishnanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lucas W RemediosDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael E KimDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hanliang XuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kurt G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
François RheaultDepartment of Computer Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Laurie E CuttingDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Peabody College of Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
MVP Data Integration into the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization ConsortiumU24AG074855 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUCCARO, MICHAEL L, HOHMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2021 to 2025
$37.5M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Integrated Training in Engineering and DiabetesT32DK101003 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jamey D. Young · 2014 to 2026
$3.9M
Novel Integrative Approach for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer using Repeated MeasuresR01CA253923 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A., MALDONADO, FABIEN · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253923NIA NIH HHS U24 AG074855NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK101003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffusion weighted MRI (dMRI) and its models of neural structure provide insight into human brain organization and variations in white matter. A recent study by McMaster, et al. showed that complex graph measures of the connectome, the graphical representation of a tractogram, vary with spatial sampling changes, but biases introduced by anisotropic voxels in the process have not been well characterized. This study uses microstructural measures (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity) and white matter bundle properties (bundle volume, length, and surface area) to further understand the effect of anisotropic voxels on microstructure and tractography.

methodsThe statistical significance of the selected measures derived from dMRI data were assessed by comparing three white matter bundles at different spatial resolutions with 44 subjects from the Human Connectome Project - Young Adult dataset scan/rescan data using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The original isotropic resolution (1.25 mm isotropic) was explored with 6 anisotropic resolutions with 0.25 mm incremental steps in the z dimension. Then, all generated resolutions were upsampled to 1.25 mm isotropic and 1 mm isotropic.

resultsThere were statistically significant differences between at least one microstructural and one bundle measure at every resolution (p≤0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). Cohen's d coefficient evaluated the effect size of anisotropic voxels on microstructure and tractography.

conclusionFractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity cannot be recovered with basic up-sampling from low quality data with gold-standard data with the methods selected for this study. However, the bundle measures across our selected regions of interest become more repeatable when voxels are resampled to 1 mm isotropic.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAdultAnisotropyConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultAnisotropyDTITractography

Identifiers

PMID41057117
PMCPMC13398146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.