Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057042›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026

No anxiety or pain reduction by Virtual Reality during oocyte retrieval in IVF/ICSI treatment: results of a randomized controlled trial.

A P van Haaps, A M F Schreurs, K Rosielle, V Mijatovic, J W Kallewaard, K Dreyer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05555498 (Virtual Reality for Anxiety and Pain Management During Oocyte Retrieval in IVF/ICSI Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05555498 naunknown statusnot on this map

Virtual Reality for Anxiety and Pain Management During Oocyte Retrieval in IVF/ICSI Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2022 to 2025Enrolled112ConditionsIVF, Procedural Pain, Procedural AnxietyArmsVirtual Reality glasses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A P van HaapsDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-5328
A M F SchreursDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-0632
K RosielleDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-6067
V MijatovicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-9921
J W KallewaardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-1796
K DreyerDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7950-0440

Funding

ZonMw 838002978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the effect of Virtual Reality (VR) on anxiety and pain during oocyte retrieval in IVF/ICSI treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is no significant effect of VR on anxiety and pain during oocyte retrieval in IVF/ICSI treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Patients undergoing oocyte retrieval in IVF/ICSI treatment often experience anxiety and pain, despite conscious sedation. VR might offer a solution since it has been successful in reducing procedural anxiety and pain during medical procedures, with the potential to replace standard analgesic care. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted between February 2023 and August 2024. Due to the nature of the intervention, the study was not blinded. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsPatients undergoing oocyte retrieval as part of IVF/ICSI treatment were screened. After providing informed consent, participants were randomized between oocyte retrieval with VR added to conscious sedation and oocyte retrieval with conscious sedation only. When assigned to the intervention group, patients received the VR intervention through a head-mounted device, showing nature films and relaxation exercises. This was added to standard care which includes analgesia and sedatives. Sounds were delivered through the head-mounted device or headphones. The primary outcome was pre- and post-procedural anxiety, measured using the STAI questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included procedural pain (NRS, scale 0-10), satisfaction scores (NRS, scale 0-10), VR preferences, and side effects. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 113 participants included: 57 in the intervention group receiving VR and 56 in the control group not receiving VR. We observed no differences between the intervention and control groups in pre-procedural anxiety (mean difference (MD) 0.14 (95% CI -1.78, 2.05), P = 0.885), post-procedural anxiety (MD 0.45 (95% CI -1.21, 2.11), P = 0.589), overall pain (MD -0.12 (95% CI -0.97, 0.73), P = 0.779), and peak pain (MD 0.59 (-0.51, 1.68), P = 0.287). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: VR might only be effective for a certain group of patients undergoing retrieval, or might be more effective in reducing pre-procedural anxiety, which in turn might lead to a reduction in procedural pain. Furthermore, it might reduce pain up to a certain threshold, or be effective when the duration of the procedure is short. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsSince VR does not affect anxiety and pain for the general patient population undergoing oocyte retrieval, we do not advise incorporating VR to standard IVF/ICSI anxiety and pain management. For future studies, it is important to investigate which subgroup could benefit from VR and how it could be implemented to study interventions from a non-pharmacological approach. Patient preferences regarding anxiety and pain management during IVF/ICSI treatment should be considered. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): External funding from ZonMw (Grant number 838002978), the Implementation and Scale-up Coaching, and the Eggcelent Change grant from Theramex have been received for this study to cover the costs of the VR devices. A.P.v.H. and K.R. report to have received a travel grant from Merck to visit ESHRE 2022. A.M.F.S. reports to have been an invited speaker at ESHRE where travel and hotel costs are covered. V.M. reports to have received institutional research grants from Guerbet, Merck, and Ferring. He has received travel and speaker's fees from Guerbet. J.W.K. reports to be on the Advisory board of Boston Scientific, Saluda, Nevro, Abbott, and Medtronic, and received consulting fees from these organizations. He is a board member of the BNS. KD reports to have received an institutional research grant from Guerbet, a speaker's fee from Guerbet, and financial support to attend meetings by Merck and Guerbet. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05555498. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 26 September 2022. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 7 February 2023.

Indexed as

AnxietyFertilization in VitroOocyte RetrievalPainPain ManagementSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansPain MeasurementProcedural Sedationanxiety reliefIVF/ICSI treatmentoocyte retrievalpain reliefpatient satisfactionVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID41057042
PMCPMC12769444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.