Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056616›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

Quantitative assessment of impact of technical and population-based factors on fairness of AI models for chest X-ray scans.

Dmitry Cherezov, Pingfu Fu, Anant Madabhushi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dmitry CherezovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: anant.madabhushi@emory.edu.

Funding

P-CARRS-BRAIN: Multi-domain (genetic, socio-behavioral, vascular) risk factors and prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease continuum in South Asians in IndiaR01AG089759 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suvarna Alladi, ALLAN I LEVEY · 2024 to 2026
$12.8M
KPMP Kidney Mapping and Atlas Project (KMAP)U01DK133090 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jonathan Himmelfarb, Matthias Kretzler · 2022 to 2026
$10.4M
Spatial Transcriptomics Explorer (STE): An open-source resource for visualizing spatial gene expression dataU24CA274494 · NCI · SAGE BIONETWORKS · PI Jineta Banerjee, Susheel Varma · 2022 to 2026
$10.1M
Pathology CoreU54CA254566 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 2020 to 2024
$5.0M
Computational Pathology of Proteinuric DiseasesR01DK118431 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARISONI, LAURA MARIACHIARA, HODGIN, JEFFREY BENTON · 2018 to 2025
$3.6M
Computer-Assisted Histologic Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft RejectionR01HL151277 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
Oral Cavity Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (OHbIC) in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OC-SCC)R01CA249992 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, JAMES, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Prostate cancer risk stratification via computational 3D pathologyR01CA268207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jonathan T.C. Liu, Anant Madabhushi · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Prognostic and Predictive Digital Tissue Image Assay for Prostate CancerR01CA268287 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SHILPA, LAL, PRITI · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
RADIOMIC APPROACHES TO IMPROVE TARGETING FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CATHETER ABLATIONR01HL158071 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARNARD, JOHN, CHUNG, MINA KAY · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
Quantitative imaging phenotypic classifier for distinguishing radiation effects from tumor recurrence in Glioblastoma .R01CA264017 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Manmeet Ahluwalia, Pallavi Tiwari · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
BLRD VA I01 BX004121BLRD VA IK6 BX006185CSRD VA I01 CX002622CSRD VA I01 CX002776NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249992NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257612NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264017NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268207NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268287NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA269181NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274494NCI NIH HHS U54 CA254566NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151277NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158071NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI175555NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089759NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE032344NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118431NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK133090NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring fairness in diagnostic AI models is essential for their safe deployment in clinical practice. This study investigates fairness by jointly analyzing population-based factors (sex and race) and technical factors (imaging site and X-ray energy) using chest X-ray data. A total of 49 datasets covering over 321,000 patients and 960,000 images were used. Six experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of these factors on model performance across classification scores, class activation maps (CAMs), and deep features (DFs). Fairness was assessed using effect sizes derived from Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics. Within single datasets, performance differences between demographic groups were generally small, with effect sizes below 0.1 for classification scores and CAMs, and up to 0.2 for deep features by sex. However, much larger discrepancies were observed when comparing the same patient group across different imaging sites, with effect sizes ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 across all metrics. Our findings suggest that technical variability has a greater impact on model behavior than population-based factors. Notably, deep features revealed more substantial group differences than surface-level outputs like diagnostic probability scores or CAMs. The findings emphasize the need to evaluate fairness not only within datasets but also across institutions, comparing model performance on training versus external populations, thereby helping to identify fairness limitations that might not be visible through single-cohort analyses.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiography, ThoracicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41056616
PMCPMC12614815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.