ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Large Language Model-Enhanced Drug Repositioning Knowledge Extraction via Long Chain-of-Thought: Development and Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Laboratory to Patient Access: A Scoping Review of the Multi-Dimensional Challenges in Drug Repurposing.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reviewing the Computational Landscape of Drug Repurposing: Evolution from Structure-Based Methods to LLM-Based Methods.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Our AI-Powered Discoveries Are Trapped in a Predigital System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An evidence-weighted knowledge framework with path-aware reasoning for personalized lifestyle management in chronic disease.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Enhanced Drug Repositioning Knowledge Extraction via Long Chain-of-Thought: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug repositioning is a pivotal strategy in pharmaceutical research, offering accelerated and cost-effective therapeutic discovery. However, biomedical information relevant to drug repositioning is often complex, dispersed, and underutilized due to limitations in traditional extraction methods, such as reliance on annotated data and poor generalizability. Large language models (LLMs) show promise but face challenges such as hallucinations and interpretability issues. Objective: This study proposed long chain-of-thought for drug repositioning knowledge extraction (LCoDR-KE), a lightweight and domain-specific framework to enhance LLMs' accuracy and adaptability in extracting structured biomedical knowledge for drug repositioning. Methods: A domain-specific schema defined 11 entities (eg, drug, disease) and 18 relationships (eg, treats, is biomarker of). Following the established schema architecture, we constructed automatic annotation based on 10,000 PubMed abstracts via chain-of-thought prompt engineering. A total of 1000 expert-validated abstracts were curated into a drug repositioning corpus, a high-quality specialized corpus, while the remaining entries were allocated for model training purposes. Then, the proposed LCoDR-KE framework combined supervised fine-tuning of the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model with reinforcement learning and dual-reward mechanisms. Performance was evaluated against state-of-the-art models (eg, conditional random fields, Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers, BioBERT, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-R1, OpenBioLLM-70B, and model variants) using precision, recall, and F1-score. In addition, the convergence of the training method was assessed by analyzing performance progression across iteration steps. Results: LCoDR-KE achieved an entity F1 of 81.46% (eg, drug 95.83%, disease 90.52%) and triplet F1 of 69.04%, outperforming traditional models and rivaling larger LLMs (DeepSeek-R1: entity F1=84.64%, triplet F1=69.02%). Ablation studies confirmed the contributions of supervised fine-tuning (8.61% and 20.70% F1 drop if removed) and reinforcement learning (6.09% and 14.09% F1 drop if removed). The training process demonstrated stable convergence, validated through iterative performance monitoring. Qualitative analysis of the model's chain-of-thought outputs showed that LCoDR-KE performed structured and schema-aware reasoning by validating entity types, rejecting incompatible relations, enforcing constraints, and generating compliant JSON. Error analysis revealed 4 main types of mistakes and challenges for further improvement. Conclusions: LCoDR-KE enhances LLMs' domain-specific adaptability for drug repositioning by offering an open-source drug repositioning corpus and a long chain-of-thought framework based on a lightweight LLM model. This framework supports drug discovery and knowledge reasoning while providing scalable, interpretable solutions applicable to broader biomedical knowledge extraction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.