Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056517›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2025

Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? The State of the Hematology and Medical Oncologist Workforce in America.

M Kelsey Kirkwood, Erin P Balogh, Melissa K Accordino, David D Chism, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Helen M Parsons, Manali I Patel, K Robin Yabroff, Laura A Levit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing Medical Student Oncology Research Experiences Through a Comprehensive Cancer Center-Led Initiative.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acute oncology hospital care at home for post-chemotherapy monitoring.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Many Titles, One Mission: Advancing Team-Based Care in Oncology.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Kelsey KirkwoodAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-4964
Erin P BaloghAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-7272-1622
Melissa K AccordinoColumbia University Medical Center, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-7279
David D ChismTennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
Elizabeth Garrett-MayerAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-0333
Helen M ParsonsUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-9858
Manali I PatelStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-5762
K Robin YabroffAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-5572
Laura A LevitAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-4229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify geographic areas and populations in the United States likely to experience challenges accessing cancer care.

methodsWe tabulated the number of hematologists and medical oncologists billing Medicare nationally, by state, and by county in 2014, 2019, and 2024, and assessed trends over time, offset by the US population age 55 years and older (where 80% of new cancers are diagnosed). We identified counties with oncologist presence, those with ≥25% of oncologists in late-career phases that could face reduced oncology care coverage in the future, as well as counties adjacent and nonadjacent to counties with oncologists, and outlined differences in populations residing in those counties. We characterized the current oncologist workforce by demographics and features of where they practice, stratified by career stage.

resultsAs the number of oncologists increased from 12,267 in 2014 to 14,547 in 2024, the number per 100,000 population age 55 years and older decreased from 15.9 to 14.9. In 2024, 38 states had fewer oncologists per capita than in 2014, with most facing limited rural workforce coverage. Although 89% of the population lived in counties with oncologists, 68% of the population lived in counties where more than a quarter of oncologists were nearing retirement age. Early-career clinicians were less likely than their later-career counterparts to work in counties that were rural or had high rates of cancer mortality, smoking, obesity, social vulnerability, uninsurance, and homes without broadband Internet access.

conclusionGaps in oncologist coverage across the country exist, especially among rural populations and those with high cancer burden and socioeconomic risk. Understanding the geographic coverage of oncologists could facilitate efforts to improve patient access to cancer care.

Indexed as

Health WorkforceHematologyMedical OncologyOncologistsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID41056517
PMCPMC12736404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.