ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2025
Finding the Extraordinary in the Ordinary: Understanding the Role of Everyday Life in Coping With Health Challenges.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protected Engagement Time and Related Interventions: A Scoping Review of Experience and Outcomes, and Relevance to the Australian Context.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Finding the Extraordinary in the Ordinary: Understanding the Role of Everyday Life in Coping With Health Challenges.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Theories of everyday life provide valuable insights into the experience of health and illness. Everyday life, as an essential part of social reality, is characterized by routines, familiarity, and practices that offer meaning, orientation, and security. However, its ordinariness also enables transformation, as disruptions caused by illness or social change necessitate adaptation and innovation. Nursing extends beyond medical treatment by considering how illness affects daily routines, relationships, and emotions. A theoretical framework of everyday life is particularly relevant in nursing, helping practitioners understand how people experience health, illness, and care. Acknowledging the role of daily living supports people in integrating health challenges into their routines and fosters person-centered care. Given the absence of a unified theory of everyday life, this study synthesizes concepts from various thinkers against empirical insights on health and illness. Philosophers such as Husserl, Heidegger, and Schütz highlight the importance of everyday preconceptions in interpreting life. They argue that individuals navigate challenges by relying on familiar patterns and adapting their experiences within daily life. In contrast, critical phenomenologists like Ahmed, Yancy, Salamon, and Al-Saji challenge this perspective, arguing that experience is shaped by social, political, and historical structures, including ethnicity, gender, class, and colonialism. In turn, theorists such as Lefebvre, Heller, and de Certeau emphasize everyday life as a dynamic space where repetition, creativity, and social relations intersect. Together, these approaches form a foundation for understanding the significance of everyday life. The synthesis of these theories with empirical findings underscores that everyday life plays a crucial role in coping with health and illness. It provides stability and orientation while enabling change, making it both a source of security and a space for transformation. This dual role of everyday life can be leveraged in nursing care to support people in managing illness and adapting to health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.