ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Comparative analysis of kVCT- and MVCT-guided helical tomotherapy for total body irradiation: evaluation of process times and residual setup errors.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between rectal bleeding and radiation delivery time in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Helical tomotherapy-based total body irradiation (TBI) traditionally employs megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) for image-guided setup; however, its 390 mm field of view (FOV) and long acquisition times constrain workflow efficiency and whole-body alignment. This study evaluated whether a newly implemented whole-body fan-beam kilovoltage CT (kVCT; 500 mm FOV) can streamline this process. In a retrospective study involving 14 patients treated with a Radixact X9 system (September 2021-September 2023), we timed the patient setup, imaging, registration, re-setup, and beam delivery for each upper-body (UB) and lower-body (LB) segment. Residual setup errors were measured along the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes. The kVCT shortened the initial setup cycle (setup + imaging + registration) from 25.4 ± 4.6 to 15.9 ± 3.3 min for UB and from 14.5 ± 3.8 to 9.4 ± 2.4 min for LB (P < 0.001 for both). The total fraction time, including delivery time, decreased from 71.8 ± 7.5 to 56.7 ± 5.3 min. When residual errors exceeded 5 mm, the additional time required for a second cycle was nearly halved with kVCT (7.3 vs. 14.3 min for UB; 4.8 vs. 8.2 min for LB). The kVCT maintained mean absolute residual errors below 2 mm in all axes, and every 95th-percentile value remained within the 5 mm tolerance recommended for tomotherapy-based TBI. These time savings are expected to reduce intrafraction motion and staff workload. Overall, whole-body kVCT enables faster, comprehensive image guidance while preserving accuracy, thereby streamlining tomotherapy-based TBI and reducing the burden on patients and clinical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.