Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056411›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Tannic acid-mediated gut microbes for enhanced intestinal immunity in Escherichia coli-challenged weaned piglets.

Wentao Zhou, Chenyu Wang, Qian Jian, Hui Zhou, Zhimin An, Yanzhong Feng, Heshu Chen, Yang Qin, Ting Yao, Hongbiao Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wentao ZhouHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0009-0007-6194-8662
Chenyu WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Qian JianDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, Hunan 410005, China.
Hui ZhouHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Zhimin AnInstitute of animal husbandry, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haerbin 150086, China.
Yanzhong FengInstitute of animal husbandry, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haerbin 150086, China.
Heshu ChenInstitute of animal husbandry, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haerbin 150086, China.
Yang QinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Ting YaoHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Hongbiao LiuZhangjiajie Jiurui Biology & Chemistry Co., Ltd, Hunan 427099, China.
Zhiwei KongDepartment of Animal Sciences, Guangxi University, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China.
Yulong YinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Liuqin HeHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Tiejun LiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Wenjie TangAnimal Breeding and Genetics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Animal Science Academy, Chengdu, Sichuan 610066, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tannic acid (TA) has astringent functions and prevents diarrhea in piglets. This study investigated the mechanism of different TA levels (0, 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%) in low-protein diets on growth performance and intestinal barrier function by regulating gut microbiota in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli (E. coli). We found that low-protein dietary supplemented with different levels of TA enhanced the growth performance of weaned piglets to some degree (P < 0.10) and significantly reduced the incidence of diarrhea under both normal and E. coli-challenged conditions (P < 0.05), but its effects on nutrient digestibility in piglets were not significant (P > 0.05). The addition of 0.05% TA effectively preserved intestinal morphological integrity and decreased serum LPS, IL-1β, and TNF-α levels, as well as increasing serum IgM and IgA concentrations in E. coli K88-challenged piglets (P < 0.05). Moreover, TA supplementation increased gene expression related to tight junctions and water channels in the ileum or colon, as well as inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB inflammatory pathway in the ileum (P < 0.05). Additionally, dietary TA supplementation altered the diversity and structural composition of microbes in the colonic chyme of E. coli K88-induced piglets. At the genus level, TA treatment increased the abundance of Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005, Ruminococcaceae_UCG_002, and Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group, while E. coli challenge decreased Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group abundance, and the abundance of these differentially microorganisms was significantly correlated with immune parameters (P < 0.05). These results indicated that adding 0.05% TA to low-protein diets without antibiotics could alleviate E. coli infection and improve immunity in piglets by regulating gut microbiota and the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. This study provides a novel nutritional strategy utilizing TA as a promising antibiotic alternative in low-protein diets to combat post-weaning diarrhea and promote intestinal health in piglets.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSwine DiseasesTanninsAnimal FeedAnimalsDiarrheaDietDietary SupplementsEscherichia coliIntestinesMalePolyphenolsSwineWeaningPolyphenolstannic acidTanninsEscherichia coli K88gut microbesimmunitytannic acidweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID41056411
PMCPMC12863937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.