ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
A digital DNA system favours the superiority of unidirectional inheritance over 'Lamarckian' inheritance.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In biology, changes to a DNA sequence can impact protein sequence but changes to protein sequences (phenotype) do not flow back into DNA (genotype). A system with bidirectional information flow (i.e., both translation and 'reverse translation') remains a theoretical possibility for an independent origin of life or an artificial biosystem, but the recent development of digital data storage in DNA does just this: changes made to a digital file can be written back into DNA, meaning changes to 'phenotype' can be written back to 'genotype'. To explore the evolutionary properties of such a system, we created an artificial system where synthetic DNA serves as genotype and music as phenotype. Audio can be output from a DNA sequence, then recorded and written to DNA as 'codons', enabling bidirectional information flow (DNA→music and music→DNA). Our results show that the mutation rate in a bidirectional system is much higher than for unidirectional information flow, and that, under reverse translation there is no mechanism for preservation of codon choice across generations. This has the effect of eliminating the impact of spontaneous synonymous mutations, a key benefit of a redundant genetic code. As a result, non-synonymous mutations are the only DNA-level changes that are transmitted across generations, and, as non-synonymous mutations can emerge at both 'genotypic' and 'phenotypic' levels, these occur at a two-fold higher frequency than in a unidirectional system. Our system holds some practical insight. First, for DNA read/write systems, it may be wise to avoid designing systems with 'de novo reverse translation' because the opportunities for mutation are higher; tracking genotype information from the preceding generation to guide this process may reduce error. Second, our system helps clarify how a 'Lamarckian' biological system might operate. We conclude that, were a 'Lamarckian' system of inheritance a feature of early genetic systems, it would likely have been short lived as the high frequency of mutation would risk driving the system to extinction. A system based on unidirectional information flow thus appears superior as there are fewer opportunities for mutational error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.