Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056320›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effectiveness and theory-based evaluation of a personalised digital intervention (EviBody®) for healthy and sustained lifestyle behaviours and well-being among adults: Study protocol for a real-world quasi-experimental study.

Jenny Rossen, Therese Anderbro, Susanne Andermo, Patrick Bergman, Maria Hagströmer, Mattias Jacobsson, Unn-Britt Johansson, Lena Kallings, Amanda Lönn, Callum Regan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05973383 (Effectiveness and Theory-based Evaluation of a Personalised Digital Intervention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05973383 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Theory-based Evaluation of a Personalised Digital Intervention (EviBody) for Healthy and Sustained Lifestyle Behaviours and Well-being Among Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorSophiahemmet UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,500ConditionsWell-beingArmsEviBody- Basic, EviBody- Standard, EviBody- Premium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jenny RossenDepartment of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4920-252X
Therese AnderbroDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne AndermoDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick BergmaneHealth Institute, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Maria HagströmerDepartment of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias JacobssonSödertörns University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Unn-Britt JohanssonDepartment of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena KallingsDepartment of Physical Activity and Health, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Amanda LönnDepartment of Physical Activity and Health, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Callum ReganDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-9323
Philip von RosenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital interventions offering behaviour change support are warranted to prevent and treat non-communicable diseases, and have been evaluated rigorously in controlled settings. Effectivenss, factors influencing the uptake of scaled-up interventions-such as reach, received dose, usability and acceptability- and predictors and mediators of efficiency are rarely explored in research. The study described herein aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a personally tailored digital intervention (the app EviBody®), intended to support healthy and sustained lifestyle behaviours among the adult population, on well-being and behaviour change. Further aims are to explore context and uptake factors, predictors and mediators for behaviour change over 24 months.

methodsThis is a real-world study, employing a quasi-experimental design and a process evaluation. EviBody® will be marketed and managed by its owner. A four-armed design will allow for comparison between three levels of intervention (basic, standard and premium) and a control group. Adults who sign up for the app will be invited to the research study including sharing app data and answering questionnaires at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Study start is Autumn 2025. Controls (n = 200 to evaluate the primary endpoint well-being at 6 months) will be recruited through advertisements on social media and asked to answer the same questionnaires at 0 and 6 months provided by email. For predicting and mediating analyses the intention is to recruit 1500 app users. Well-being (measured with the WHO-5 Well-Being Index), goal achievement, physical activity, eating habits, mental health, mediators (motivation, self-efficacy, and perceived barriers), and demographics will be self-reported. Uptake will be collected using analytics and ratings of usability and acceptability, and described by demographics. Mixed models for repeated measures and structural equation modelling will be employed for data analysis. DISCUSSION: Besides evaluating the effectivenss of a digital intervention, this study also applies a theory-based evaluation to understand which mediators are effective, for whom they are effective, and the specific conditions under which they are most beneficial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05973383 on 8 July 2023.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleMobile ApplicationsAdultFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41056320
PMCPMC12503243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.