ArticlePloS one2025
Estimated glucose disposal rate predicts frailty through diabetes: Evidence from machine learning and mediation models in NHANES.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs an emerging insulin resistance marker, the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and frailty needs further exploration. This study examines the eGDR-frailty link, develops a machine learning predictive model to address this gap, and explores diabetes mellitus (DM) as a mediator, providing new insights for clinical intervention.
methodsUsing National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. Feature selection used LASSO, and class imbalance was handled by SMOTEN. The resampled data were split 7:3 into a training set (n = 29,309) and a test set (n = 12,561).Ten machine learning models were built, with discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility evaluated to identify the optimal model. Confusion matrices visualized performance. Mediation analysis assessed DM's role in the eGDR-frailty relationship.
resultsAmong 26,282 participants, eGDR negatively correlated with frailty. Higher eGDR significantly reduced frailty risk in subgroups: women, age ≤ 60, normal/high BMI, never/current smokers, and alcohol users. LASSO selected 12 predictors. Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model's predicted probability of frailty. Confusion matrices validated classification accuracy. Mediation analysis showed DM partially mediated the eGDR-frailty relationship: indirect effect β=-0.003 (95% CI -0.003 to -0.002; P < 0.001), mediation proportion = 8.71%.
conclusionThis first NHANES-based study demonstrates a significant negative correlation between eGDR and frailty, confirming DM's partial mediating role. The developed machine learning models effectively support early frailty risk assessment and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.