ArticlePloS one2025
Systematic review protocol: The effects of theory-based interventions for self-help practices in the management of mild to moderate depression.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis protocol outlines a planned systematic review to assess the effects of theory-based interventions for self-help practices in managing mild to moderate depression. Depression is a leading global cause of disability and contributes significantly to the worldwide burden. Self-help practices present promising avenues for care. When grounded in psychological theory, these interventions may offer a structured and effective approach to symptom management. However, their effectiveness varies and often lack a theoretical foundation. The summarized evidence on theory-based interventions remains limited.
objectivesThis review aims to evaluate the effects of theory-based self-help interventions in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms among adults with mild or moderate depression. It also aims to report any adverse effects associated with the use of these interventions.
methodsThe review will follow PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration ID: CRD42024613188. Randomized controlled trials published between January 2014 and 2025 will be included in the analysis. Eligible theory-based interventions include Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs), delivered via digital platforms. Studies will be identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane bibliographic databases. Title and abstract screening will be completed within two months of the initial search, followed by one month for data extraction and two months for synthesis and analysis. Two reviewers will conduct screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment independently using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). Key outcomes include changes in depressive symptom severity and adverse effects. ANTICIPATED
resultsThe planned synthesis will evaluate the effects of theory-based interventions, highlighting the anticipated contributions of theoretical frameworks to intervention outcomes. EXPECTED IMPACTS: The anticipated findings aim to inform future evidence-based guidelines for integration into primary care, supporting the development of accessible, scalable, and effective mental health solutions globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.