Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41056257›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Multidrug-resistant bacterial profiles of inanimate objects at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Hiwot Lidet Yosef, Meron Yohannes, Regasa Diriba, Melese Hailu Legese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiwot Lidet YosefDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4888-6549
Meron YohannesDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Regasa DiribaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melese Hailu LegeseDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNosocomial pathogens are responsible for severe infections and are typically acquired in healthcare settings within days of patient admission. One of the primary contributors to the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is the transfer of bacteria from inanimate surfaces to patients.

methodsA cross-sectional study was done at Zewditu Memorial Hospital from June to November 2024. For this study, 204 inanimate surfaces from operating rooms and intensive care units were swabbed and cultured on MacConkey and blood agar. Bacteria were identified based on their colony morphology, gram staining, and conventional biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using disk diffusion. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing gram-negative bacteria were confirmed phenotypically using the double disc synergy and combination disc methods, while carbapenemase producers were identified using the Modified Carbapenem inactivation method. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was detected via the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.

resultsOf the 204 swabbed samples, 77.45% (n = 158/204) showed bacterial growth, yielding a total of 171 bacterial isolates. Among these, Gram-positive bacteria comprised 71.3% (n = 122/171), while Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 28.7% (n = 49/171). The most prevalent isolates were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), making up 46.1% (n = 79/171), followed by Bacillus spp. at 21.6% (n = 37/171). Out of the total isolates, 55 were identified as pathogenic bacteria based on their potential to cause disease and selected for antibiotic resistance testing. P. aeruginosa 36.7% (n = 18/49), Acinetobacter spp. 16.3% (n = 8/49), E. coli 14.2% (n = 7/49) and S. aureus 4.9% (n = 6/122) were the commonest pathogenic bacteria identified. Gram-negative bacteria showed high resistance to ampicillin (67.3%), amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (61.2%), ciprofloxacin (63.2%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (63.2%), cefepime (57.1%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (55.1%). Similarly gram-positive bacteria showed high resistance to azithromycin (100%), penicillin (100%), clindamycin (100%), and erythromycin (100%). Multidrug resistance was observed in 61.8% (n = 34/55) of the tested gram-negative and gram-positive isolates. The incidence of ESBL-producing and carbapenemase-producing bacteria among the suspected gram-negative bacteria was 26.5% (n=13/49) and 12.2% (n=6/49), respectively. The prevalence of MRSA was 50% (n=3/6).

conclusionThe study identified a significant presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the hospital environment and on inanimate surfaces, emphasizing the urgent need for effective infection prevention and control measures.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaGram-Negative BacteriaHospitalsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID41056257
PMCPMC12503313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.