ReviewAANA journal2025
PrEP-ared for Surgery? A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Perioperative Recommendations for Anesthesia Providers.
Review in AANA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention has increased significantly, with approximately 30% of eligible individuals in the U.S. receiving a prescription by 2021, up from 13% in 2017. As more patients on PrEP undergo surgical procedures, understanding the perioperative implications of these medications is crucial for anesthesia providers. This review aims to summarize current literature on the perioperative considerations for patients on PrEP and provide anesthesia providers with key recommendations to optimize patient safety and outcomes. It examines the pharmacology, side effects, and perioperative considerations of current PrEP formulations: Truvada, Descovy, and Apretude. We conducted a broad literature search focusing on publications from 2013 through 2024. The review identifies potential nephrotoxicity with tenofovir-based formulations, particularly when combined with nephrotoxic agents such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide use is associated with an increased risk of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. No specific anesthetic agents are contraindicated, but dose adjustments for renally excreted drugs may be necessary. Current evidence supports continuing PrEP throughout the perioperative period, with strategies provided for managing different formulations during surgery. As PrEP use expands, anesthesia providers must balance safe, effective care with contributing to HIV prevention efforts. Future research should focus on long-term anesthetic implications of PrEP and optimal perioperative management strategies. By implementing informed practices, anesthesia providers can significantly enhance the care of patients on PrEP and support broader public health goals in HIV prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.