Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055999›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

When noncanonical olfaction is optimal.

Caitlin Lienkaemper, Meg A Younger, Gabriel Koch Ocker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caitlin LienkaemperDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-2570-4165
Meg A YoungerCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-7939
Gabriel Koch OckerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-9576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early olfactory system is canonically described by a "one-receptor-to-one-neuron" model: each olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) expresses a single type of olfactory receptor (OR). Although the olfactory systems of many model organisms approximately follow this canonical organization, a number of exceptions are known. In particular, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes coexpress multiple types of ORs in many OSNs. Why do some olfactory systems follow the canonical organization while others violate it? We approach this question from the normative perspective of efficient coding. We find that the canonical and noncanonical organizations optimally encode odor signals in different types of olfactory environment. Noncanonical olfaction is beneficial when relevant sources emit correlated odorants and the environment contains odorants from ethologically irrelevant odor sources. Our theory explains previous observations of receptor coexpression and provides a framework from which to understand the structure of early olfactory systems.

Indexed as

Olfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantSmellAedesAnimalsOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysReceptors, Odorantefficient codinginformation theoryolfaction

Identifiers

PMID41055999
PMCPMC12541337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.