Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055977›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Dynamic sensor selection for biomarker discovery.

Joshua Pickard, Cooper Stansbury, Amit Surana, Lindsey Muir, Anthony Bloch, Indika Rajapakse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua PickardDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-3200
Cooper StansburyDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Amit SuranaRTX Technology Research Center, East Hartford, CT 06118.
Lindsey MuirDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-0325
Anthony BlochDepartment of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-9765
Indika RajapakseDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-9168

Funding

Systems and Integrative Biology Training ProgramT32GM150581 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DANIEL A BEARD · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-22-1-0215DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-23-1-0400HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) GM150581National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF DMS-2103026NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM150581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in biotechnologies enable monitoring of biological systems with unprecedented resolution, yet identifying and interpreting biological signals remains a major challenge in clinical and research settings. Classically, biomarkers are measurable indicators of the state of biological processes. Given the large number of molecules in modern datasets, a major challenge is identifying the best biomarkers for a particular setting. Here, we apply observability theory to establish a general methodology for biomarker selection. We demonstrate that observability identifies biologically meaningful sensors in a range of time series transcriptomics data. To address unique biological constraints, we introduce the method of dynamic sensor selection to maximize observability over time, thus enabling observability over regimes where system dynamics themselves are subject to change. Our observability-guided biomarker discovery framework extends to multiple data modalities, as demonstrated with the joint use of transcriptomics and chromosome conformation data. We demonstrate the generality of this approach by evaluating the observability of neural activity measured in movies and electroencephalograms. These applications highlight the broad utility of observability-guided biomarker selection, spanning agriculture, biomanufacturing, and neural systems.

Indexed as

BiomarkersElectroencephalographyGene Expression ProfilingHumansTranscriptomeBiomarkersbiomarkersdata driven observabilitydynamic sensor selectionobservabilitysensor selection

Identifiers

PMID41055977
PMCPMC12541339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.