ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Evolving Health Information-Seeking Behavior in the Context of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Alexa: Interview Study Using the Think-Aloud Protocol.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversational AI increases political knowledge as effectively as self-directed internet search.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Oral Health Information and Its Influence on Patient Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Consumer and Patient Health Information Seeking With Generative AI Tools: Scoping Review of Facilitators and Barriers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the quality, reliability and readability of digital and artificial intelligence resources for adults with cancer who have significant caregiving responsibilities for children.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Navigating Diabetes Management in the Digital Era: Scoping Review of Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- ChatGPT performance in orthodontics : Assessment of accuracy and repeatability in patient instruction and management using Global Quality Score.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
- AI Health Literacy: a reflective framework for LLM-based generative AI in public health education and promotion.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline health information seeking is undergoing a major shift with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered technologies such as voice assistants and large language models (LLMs). While existing health information-seeking behavior models have long explained how people find and evaluate health information, less is known about how users engage with these newer tools, particularly tools that provide "one" answer rather than the resources to investigate a number of different sources.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore how people use and perceive AI- and voice-assisted technologies when searching for health information and to evaluate whether these tools are reshaping traditional patterns of health information seeking and credibility assessment.
methodsWe conducted in-depth qualitative research with 27 participants (ages 19-80 years) using a think-aloud protocol. Participants searched for health information across 3 platforms-Google, ChatGPT, and Alexa-while verbalizing their thought processes. Prompts included both a standardized hypothetical scenario and a personally relevant health query. Sessions were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns in search behavior, perceptions of trust and utility, and differences across platforms and user demographics.
resultsParticipants integrated AI tools into their broader search routines rather than using them in isolation. ChatGPT was valued for its clarity, speed, and ability to generate keywords or summarize complex topics, even by users skeptical of its accuracy. Trust and utility did not always align; participants often used ChatGPT despite concerns about sourcing and bias. Google's AI Overviews were met with caution-participants frequently skipped them to review traditional search results. Alexa was viewed as convenient but limited, particularly for in-depth health queries. Platform choice was influenced by the seriousness of the health issue, context of use, and prior experience. One-third of participants were multilingual, and they identified challenges with voice recognition, cultural relevance, and data provenance. Overall, users exhibited sophisticated "mix-and-match" behaviors, drawing on multiple tools depending on context, urgency, and familiarity.
conclusionsThe findings suggest the need for additional research into the ways in which search behavior in the era of AI- and voice-assisted technologies is becoming more dynamic and context-driven. While the sample size is small, participants in this study selectively engaged with AI- and voice-assisted tools based on perceived usefulness, not just trustworthiness, challenging assumptions that credibility is the primary driver of technology adoption. Findings highlight the need for digital health literacy efforts that help users evaluate both the capabilities and limitations of emerging tools. Given the rapid evolution of search technologies, longitudinal studies and real-time observation methods are essential for understanding how AI continues to reshape health information seeking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.