ArticleScience progress
Implications for cystic fibrosis therapy: Potentiator icenticaftor is superior to ivacaftor in improving function and maintaining stability of F508del CFTR.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare CFTR potentiators icenticaftor versus ivacaftor (IVA) to elucidate efficacy in augmenting CFTR function while preserving CFTR protein levels.MethodsSingle-channel measurements of CFTR in the presence and absence of IVA or icenticaftor were performed with membrane vesicles from BHK-21 cells stably expressing CFTR. CFTR-expressing BHK-21 cells and non-cystic fibrosis (CF) and CF primary human bronchial epithelial cultures were treated for 48 hours with elexacaftor/tezacaftor (ELX/TEZ) plus IVA or icenticaftor and then western blot analyses were performed to assess CFTR protein maturation. Non-CF and CF primary human bronchial epithelial cultures treated with CFTR modulators were subjected to Ussing chamber analysis to evaluate CFTR functional rescue upon 48-hour treatment and acute potentiator exposure.ResultsCorrector-rescued F508del CFTR displayed increased function with icenticaftor compared to IVA by single-channel measurements. In primary F508del cultures, 48-hour treatment with ELX/TEZ plus icenticaftor led to increased CFTR function in Ussing chambers compared to treatment with ELX/TEZ plus IVA. Western blot analysis demonstrated that F508del was destabilized by IVA but not icenticaftor. Primary N1303K CFTR cultures did not exhibit enhanced rescue with icenticaftor when compared to IVA, indicating that different CFTR mutations respond differently to potentiators.ConclusionIcenticaftor is superior to IVA as a potentiator for ELX/TEZ-rescued F508del CFTR, as 48-hour treatment with icenticaftor enhanced F508del function but did not destabilize F508del. Understanding the mechanisms underlying CFTR potentiator activities may offer further benefits for people with CF who have F508del or other CFTR mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.