Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41055899›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2026

Stable angina in young women.

Carolyn M Webb, Peter Collins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn M WebbNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2538-6953
Peter CollinsNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3377-3160

Funding

Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is the primary cause of cardiovascular death worldwide. Worryingly, the prevalence of IHD is increasing in younger women, with a 3% increase between 1990 and 2019. Although global IHD death rates have decreased in younger women overall, IHD mortality in younger women is increasing in certain high-income countries. Angina is the primary presenting symptom of suspected IHD and coronary artery disease. The presence of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease is associated with an increased risk of major cardiovascular events compared with those without angina. Angina in young women is linked to future premature IHD events. There are particular features to consider in younger women presenting with stable angina-anginal symptom characterization may align with older women, but angina may occur cyclically in younger women and a similar pattern may be evident on diagnostic testing. Pathophysiologic mechanisms for angina in some young women may involve effects of ovarian hormones on vascular beds of the cardiovascular system. Traditional IHD risk factors are common to women and men; however, there are certain sex differences in their relevance to IHD risk, as well as influences that female hormones and reproduction have over a life course that affect IHD risk. In this review, we will explore stable angina in young women, consider possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved in their symptom presentation, and present risk factors associated with IHD in women. In addition, potential treatment options will be discussed and attention will be drawn to gaps in the evidence, proposing areas where more research is necessary.

Indexed as

Angina, StableAdultFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMyocardial IschemiaRisk FactorsYoung AdultANOCAINOCAIschaemic heart diseaseRisk factorsStable anginaYoung women

Identifiers

PMID41055899
PMCPMC13247187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.